Legally Speaking- Implied-But Unauthorized-Endorsement
By Bob Mionske
Posted Jan. 2, 2003
I am a professional triathlete and have a question about a company using my picture in an advertisement in a way that implies I endorse the product (which is not true). Do I have any legal rights? I live in California, which is where the advertisement was run and where the company that ran the ad is located.(
Name withheld by request
The unauthorized use of a performer or celebrity name or image may be a violation of both state and federal copyright law. The tort of “invasion of privacy, false light may have been committed. Your right of publicity may have been violated as well. On the federal level, the Lanham Act may apply.On the state level, look to California Civil Code 3344 (the Fred Astaire celebrity protection act). Leading cases that may control in your jurisdiction include Midler V. Ford, 849 f.2d 460 (9th cir. 1988) (the “sound alike” case), Presley Enterprises v. Capece, 950 F. Supp. 783 (S.D. Tex. 1996) (the “velvet Elvis” case) and Astaire v. Best Film & Video, 1997 WL 336110 (9th Cir. Jun. 20, 1997). In terms of damages, California Civil Code 3344 affords damages to a person injured by another who uses the person’s “name, voice, signature, photograph or likeness in any manner.” The company may be liable for a fixed sum and/or profits obtained by the unauthorized use of your likeness. If you simply want them to stop, consider sending a cease and desist letter with reference to the above listed controlling law.(
The information provided in the "Legally speaking" column is not legal advice. The information provided on this public web site is provided solely for the general interest of the visitors to this web site. The information contained in the column applies to general principles of American jurisprudence and may not reflect current legal developments or statutory changes in the various jurisdictions and therefore should not be relied upon or interpreted as legal advice. Understand that reading the information contained in this column does not mean you have established an attorney-client relationship with attorney Bob Mionske. Readers of this column should not act upon any information contained in the web site without first seeking the advice of legal counsel.
This article, Implied--But Unauthorized--Endorsement, was originally published on Velonews on January 2, 2003.
January 22, 2014
LA Weekly: Lose Your License For a Minor Hit-&-Run Under New Proposal By Dennis Romero Wed, Jan 22, 2014 a...
January 11, 2014
Road.cc: BMW driver who blamed cyclist for crash after hitting rider, 2 pedestrians, and a bus fined £300 and d...
January 10, 2014
Originally published Friday, January 10, 2014 The Seattle Times: Why are drivers so angry at cyclists? Wher...
September 22, 2013
The Boston Globe: After every crash in Netherlands, intense scrutiny By Martine Powers | Globe Staff Septem...
January 28, 2014
Welcome Bob Mionske to the Bike Law team! We (Ann and Peter) are thrilled to welcome Bob Mionske to the Bike Law...